“HEALTH” STANDARDS – A STATEWIDE CALL TO ACTION—thru July 18th

Your comments by July 18th on the Waltz administration’s radically sexualized public-school K-12 “sexual health” standards will help set the stage for upcoming battles. They are tucked within broader health curriculum updates. Please do not be put off by the survey process or intentionally deep layers of “BS” in its early pages. Go to the MN Department of Education survey at this link for both the draft curriculum and survey form. If you only want to offer general comments on the draft’s sexual content, or other areas, consider skipping ahead to questions 22 and 23 to submit your comments (you can upload a document attachment). We will work with others to provide more detailed feedback on individual benchmarks and more.

Comments will become part of the official record for this radical reach for our children’s minds. Record building, like your survey input, will matter. Click here to view or download the Second Draft as a PDF.

Designed to overcome local community standards, these statewide standards impose progressive dogma so every child will be taught to find their “authentic” self through unlimited sexual exploration. Starting in pre-school, every child will be taught that boys turn into girls and that girls turn into boys; that there are unlimited genders; and that family formation and parenting are oppressive structures to be overcome in the creation of a new “social justice” society. Most disturbing is the emphasis of this indoctrination well before the age of reason when trusting young minds are the most vulnerable to distortion.

I urge you to look at the “Sexual Health” strand, pages 7-71 where the sexual requirements are presented by grade level. You may be shocked.

Examples of Sexual Health K-12 Public School Requirements

• Under “Sexual Health” Kindergarteners (Code 0.4.1.02) will learn of germ transmission and prevention. Is this “safe sex” for 5year-olds? This concept is more appropriately addressed outside of “sexual” health.
• Third graders (Code 3.4.1.02-04) learn to describe external and internal reproductive body parts in a gender-neutral way (e.g., since some “real” girls have male parts and some “real” boys have female body parts); what makes an adult trustworthy (i.e. “affirming” of this sexual dogma), and about sexual consent. The word “parent” is notably absent here and elsewhere.
• Fourth graders are taught about sexual disease and prevention with a special assurance that “HIV is not easily transmitted like other common infectious diseases” and about relationship options and getting help with these decisions. Parents are not mentioned.
• Fifth graders get more advanced safer sex training (with a special assurance that HIV is not easily caught) and are required to affirm LGBTQIA dogma about sexual identity and there being differences between sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity and expression. Parents are not mentioned.
• Seventy-eight more individual sexual benchmarks cement sexual indoctrination of progressive sexual beliefs in grades 6, 7, and 8.
• Twenty-six more benchmarks for high schools imagine a robust sexual life including birth control, dealing with unwanted pregnancies (including the right to confidential services from trusted community organizations), with a single offhanded notation that abstinence prevents all the negative outcomes.

Please share this with your friends, family, and other contacts—encourage them to comment! Standing together for our children and our future.

Michael McCarthy, Chair

Fixing Stillwater Schools

www.fixingstillwaterschools.org